![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/0062458825.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Closed Casket (2016)by Sophie Hannah
![]() No current Talk conversations about this book. I never give negative reviews to a book, knowing that the author worked hard to create it (and doing something I cannot do). In this case however, I felt compelled to give my opinion. I have previously read the first of Sophie Hannah's "Poirot" novels and didn't care for it, but felt that I needed to read more of the series before I wrote my thoughts down. I feel that some of the best parts of the Agatha Christie's novels are the characters that she created, and how the reader is made to feel sympathetic or to be repelled towards them. Ms. Hannah seems unable to create a character that I don't dislike. Now, I don't understand her refusal to use previously used "Poirot" characters (i.e. Hastings, Japp, Mrs. Oliver), but maybe it is better. Her narrator, Inspector Catchpool, is perhaps one of the most unlikable characters I have ever come across. He is, quite frankly, a jerk. He is opinionated and smug. He comes across as hating Poirot, even though he writes about him. He is so very stupid that he makes Hastings look like Sherlock Holmes. Ms. Hannah's books (and I have only read her Poirot books) are not even interesting, and I couldn't wait to finish it. It doesn't feel like it is taking place in the 1930s either. Now, Agatha Christie is not always perfect (and I have read her Poirot books several times), being rather racist at times (I know. I know, they were written in a different time period), and sometimes a bit formulaic, but I always love re-reading them. She was a very special author. I shouldn't compare Sophie Hannah to her, and try not to. I have read the Robert Goldsborough "Nero Wolfe" books and enjoy them. I have purchased the third Sophie Hannah "Poirot" book and will read it. I hope I will enjoy it. ( ![]() I must admit that I did not enjoy Sophie Hannah's first Poirot reboot book, but after reading some of the reviews on this her second one, I thought it night be a worth a try. This was a more enjoyable book for sure. I liked the characters (with the exception of Sophie Hannah's Poirot who seems like a ghost of the original Poirot). The mystery is tricky and intricate, but I thought it went on a bit too long, and got too convoluted at the end. I must admit that I did figure out who the murderer was at about 2/3 of the way through, and I thought it took a little too long to get there. A shorter book with more of a direct denouement, would have improved this book to my way of thinking. But all in all, it wasn't a bad example of a country house murder in the style Agatha Christie, Dorothy Sayers or Ngaio Marsh. The murder was sufficiently bloody, but also very puzzling. I particularly liked Inspector Catchpool. It may be worth while to read another book in the series if the books keep improving like this one did. Kirjalla oli hetkensä, mutta pääasiassa uskomatonta scheissea. This is the second Poirot revival written by Sophie Hannah, and it was perhaps a bit better than the first (in my opinion). I was happy to see Catchpool play more of the sleuth and less of the emotionally unstable, dependent character he was in the first book. The mystery was intriguing and the writing solid, although I felt this one didn’t highlight all the fun idiosyncrasies of Poirot that fans know and love. Once again it was a good attempt, but I think I’m the future I’ll just stick with classic Christie. She can’t be beat or even replicated. This rather intricate mystery has some clues for astute readers to pick up, and some red herrings to add confusion. But readers are not privy to enough clues to solve the murder until close to the end of the story. And that, likely, is what makes it a compelling tale. Lady Playford has changed her will, leaving most of her vast fortune, not to her two grown children, but to her personal secretary. She makes this announcement at a dinner, to the astonishment of her family, employees, and invited guests. Needless to say, it does not end well for one of these people. People may complain that this continuation of Agatha Christie’s characters is not true to writing style of Christie, but even if that were true, it should not detract from the fact that this story is well written in its own right. The writing is tight, the story is well thought out, and the new character of Edward Catchpool works well as the narrator of the story. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to SeriesIs contained in
"What I intend to say to you will come as a shock ..." With these words, Lady Athelinda Playford -- one of the world's most beloved children's authors -- springs a surprise on the lawyer entrusted with her will. As guests arrive for a party at her Irish mansion, Lady Playford has decided to cut off her two children without a penny . . . and leave her vast fortune to someone else: an invalid who has only weeks to live. Among Lady Playford's visitors are two strangers: the famous Belgian detective Hercule Poirot, and Inspector Edward Catchpool of Scotland Yard. Neither knows why he has been invited -- until Poirot begins to wonder if Lady Playford expects a murder. But why does she seem so determined to provoke a killer? And why -- when the crime is committed despite Poirot's best efforts to stop it -- does the identity of the victim make no sense at all? No library descriptions found.
|
Popular covers
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.914Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1945-1999LC ClassificationRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |